ICE Hero Kills Domestic Terrorist in Minneapolis Saving Lives

akuperma: Factually wrong.

The law enforcement officer ordered her out of the car. To be arrested. She resisted arrest. And attempted to flee and become a fugitive. Law enforcement lawfully, and as trained, attempted to stop her escape from justice.

She then used her vehicle as a deadly weapon moving in the direction of the law enforcement officer. He then used his best split second judgement that she may run him over. While the videos are unclear whether or not she did or did not actually end up hitting him before he stopped her, as well as being unclear whether she was moving directly into him or moving slightly to his left, he was left with a life or death judgement whether she was attacking him with a moving automobile. The law protects the law enforcement officer in such circumstances.

She created the deadly circumstances by refusing a lawful order to stop and get out of her vehicle. After refusing that lawful order and resisting arrest, she illegally switched her vehicle from reverse into forward, where the officer was standing.

The earlier attempt lawfully ordering her to drive her SUV out of the way and stop impending the carrying out of law enforcement activities, she had refused to comply with. She missed that opportunity by refusing the lawful order to get out of the way. At that point she was being placed under arrest and legally could no longer move away.

Your idea that he should have called the local police is foolhardy. Should the ICE police officer have called 911 after she ran over him with her SUV?

CA: All the points cited were widely reported. In addition to what is seen on the various videos circulating. There isn’t much dispute as to the timeline. It is only the interpertation thereof that the left-wing Big Media and their Democrat Party friends are hyperventilating about.

No one disputes she has in the past been active working against ICE enforcement.
No one disputes she was intentionally blocking ICE on the road with her vehicle.
No one disputes she was asked to move out of the way.
No one disputes she was ordered to exit her vehicle to surrender for arrest.
No one disputes she refused to exit and resisted arrest before events took a turn for the worse.
No one disputes she attempted to flee after being ordered to exit.
No one disputes she reversed her vehicle while a police officer had his hands on her door trying to open it.
No one disputes she the switched to forward and accelerated while another police officer was in front of her car.

And there’s a new video out from the front angle showing that she hit the officer in front with her car. That was the officer who shot her in self-defense.

Good riddance to this deadly agitater.

The New York Times and the Washington Post and and Bellingcat, all left-wing outlets, agree in their analysis and conclude that physical contact occurred between the woman’s SUV and the ICE agent. (Those outlets try to poo-poo it by dismissing it as “only” being the SUV clipped or brushed his leg.)

The woman’s presence at the scene was intention to be there to oppose ICE. It was not as originally claimed that she was merely passing by coincidentally.

Her vehicle stopped diagonally, blocking the lane to stop ICE: Obstruction of Governmental Administration (OGA) or “Interfering with a Federal Officer” (18 U.S.C. § 111)

A “prima facie” case exists against her of Fleeing a Peace Officer (MN Stat § 609.487) and Resisting Arrest when an officer with “apparent authority” ordered her out of a car and she instead put the car in reverse to drive away.

An agent was still physically touching the door handle when she shifted into reverse. Under 18 U.S.C. § 111, “forcible interference” does not require a strike. If her movement caused the agent to stumble or jerked his arm, it can be charged as Assault on a Federal Officer.

By accelerating forward while an agent was at the front corner of the car, who her SUV hit (which wasn’t even necessary for this crime but strengthens the case against her) she weaponized the vehicle. This is Domestic Terrorism/Attempted Murder.

Since the ICE police officer believed the SUV was veering into him (and it in fact did hit him, which isn’t even necessary for his belief), his “reasonable belief” of a threat justifies his discharging his weapon against her under federal law. So the first shot is definitely self-defense. As far as the second and third shots, once a “threat” is perceived (the car accelerating), the officer makes the decision to fire a “volley” of shots; even if the car passes him and the threat is gone by the second or third shot, the human brain takes roughly 1.5 seconds to process that the danger has ended and to signal the finger to stop pulling the trigger.